Negotiations on Thursday between the Union Ministry of Home Affairs and delegations from the Leh Apex Body and Kargil Democratic Alliance produced no agreement, with both regional groups maintaining that the federal government's proposed framework fell short of their call for a constitutionally protected elected legislature for Ladakh. Talks are due to resume on 22 October, with New Delhi serving as the venue.
At the heart of the talks sits a proposal to establish an elected body at Union Territory level — one that would hold legislative, executive, and financial authority — alongside a constitutional arrangement sought under Article 371(K). Proposals covering the framework, authority, and constitutional protections of the planned body were put before the meeting by the MHA, according to LAB chairman Chering Dorjay Lakruk.
Talks between LAB and KDA — bodies drawn from political and social constituencies in Leh and Kargil respectively — are under way with the Centre. Their delegation put forward an independent draft along with written answers to seven questions posed by the ministry, and Lakruk noted that a wide disparity remained between the ministry's offer and the union's demands, while stressing that the process had not broken down and further discussions were expected.
His contention was that an earlier arrangement — under which the proposed body's head would prepare the Chief Secretary's Annual Performance Report — had been set aside by the Centre. Ladakh's representatives, Lakruk added, found that the draft on constitutional safeguards left the specific subjects and powers they were seeking undefined.
Under the MHA's plan, a dedicated constitutional arrangement — structured around Article 371(K) — would be established for Ladakh. Talks over the exact wording and the scope of authority that would belong to the proposed elected body are still ongoing.
Among their standing demands, these organisations are pressing for full statehood, constitutional protections under the Sixth Schedule, reserved government positions for local residents, and distinct parliamentary seats covering both Leh and Kargil. During a 9 September gathering, the MHA put forward questions about how the proposed body would be structured, what powers it would hold, and how it would relate to the already-operating Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Councils.
Popularly elected representation on the proposed region-wide body formed part of the governance framework under consideration. A deadline of 18 October was set for the groups to review the proposals and deliver their response to the MHA.
When India reorganised the former state of Jammu and Kashmir in October 2019, Ladakh was carved out as a distinct Union Territory, one that operates without its own legislative assembly. Positioned where India's frontiers meet both China and Pakistan, the area carries considerable weight in regional power dynamics.
No formal communication from the MHA had been released regarding Thursday's gathering, based on available reports.