Polling data published in Israeli outlets this week placed Netanyahu's political bloc ahead of the grouping aligned with Gadi Eisenkot. Recent polling places Netanyahu's bloc at roughly 53 seats within the 120-seat Knesset, with Eisenkot's grouping trailing at 51 or 52 — a gap that some attribute to how certain parties or candidates have been excluded from the count.
Seat tallies across parties without a stake in Netanyahu remaining in office add up to roughly 67 in total. The tally lands six seats beyond the threshold needed for a parliamentary majority, a margin that has rarely appeared in the country's modern political history.
In earlier eras of multi-party competition — after Mapai's dominance over single-party rule had loosened — a prime minister confronted with an opposition bloc holding 67 seats in the two weeks before an election would generally have been considered well behind in the race. Reports indicate that Netanyahu holds a lead, according to available information.
Questions about how political blocs are tallied have drawn scrutiny over whether the methodology advantages Netanyahu. Several groups that oppose him are kept outside the change bloc — whether because they favour a national unity government, hold incompatible views with other opposition parties, or are simply not regarded as natural allies within that coalition. Detractors contend that the underlying numbers tell a different story from the one that particular formatting and presentation decisions tend to convey.
Holding enough seats to form a bloc and holding enough trust to govern as a coalition represent two distinct political realities. Knesset seat allocations take shape through the voting process that precedes any government formation. Government formation talks get under way only once those results are in.
Opposing Netanyahu does not bind a party to entering an Eisenkot-led administration, just as lending external backing to a government leaves open the option of staying outside the formal coalition structure. Advising the president, by contrast, represents an altogether different kind of undertaking. Critics have pointed out that Netanyahu's approach draws on a deliberate blurring of those two distinct concepts as a way of advancing political ends.
A closer look at three distinct groupings — the Reservists party, the Arab parties, and the slate led by Ofer Winter — points to where the standard electoral calculations may fall short. Polling that assigns the Reservists party roughly four seats places it outside the change bloc, given that its leadership backs a national unity government arrangement. Having a view on how a government should be formed does not automatically translate into endorsement of any particular leader's hold on power.
Surveys of reservists show their positions on the issues drawing the most attention within their ranks — among them judicial overhaul, shared military service requirements, governing structures, and the status of Palestinian territories — landing closer to those held by opposition parties working to replace Netanyahu than to the coalition he heads together with Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, and the haredi party bloc.
Leaving Arab parties out of the count introduces a measurable skew into how results are tallied. Over an extended period, Netanyahu has worked to foster the perception among broad segments of the electorate that ballots cast by Arab citizens of Israel carry diminished weight in deciding electoral outcomes.
Forty-nine seats went to Labor and Meretz combined in the 1992 contest, with Hadash and the Arab Democratic Party contributing an additional five, pushing Yitzhak Rabin's bloc past the 61-seat threshold needed to command a parliamentary majority. When Shas withdrew its support, Rabin's coalition depended on backing from Arab parties to maintain its parliamentary footing.
The coalition that took shape in 2021 drew its governing majority of 61 seats partly from Ra'am, an Arab Islamist party holding four seats, with Yair Lapid playing a central role in bringing those disparate factions together to displace Netanyahu from the premiership. Questions about why haredi parties hold a place in Netanyahu's coalition have not been consistently put to him by journalists covering the government.
A tally of the available places is recorded through an automated process. Ideological differences, however, tend to be invoked as a rationale for leaving Arab-affiliated parties out of coalition arithmetic altogether.
A formation entering the contest as its third variable centres on a party under the leadership of Ofer Winter, a retired brigadier-general. A recommendation to the president that Netanyahu lead the formation of the next government is what Winter indicated he intends to put forward. Where Winter diverges from the coalition partners Netanyahu relies upon is his position in favour of drafting haredi men into military service — a stance that sits at odds with those allies despite his otherwise broadly conservative outlook.
Those projected seat totals, based on the figures being discussed, would place Netanyahu at 53 — a tally that falls eight seats below the threshold needed for a governing majority, even with Winter included. Seats in parliament are determined by electoral outcomes, not by what any president recommends.
Any incoming administration committed to reform would carry a broad policy workload, large portions of which could move forward independently of any resolution on the Israeli-Palestinian question. Among the tasks awaiting any successor government would be rebuilding diplomatic ties, resolving the long-running standoff over military conscription and the place of ultra-Orthodox communities in public life, restoring functional standards of public administration, tackling elevated levels of violent crime, and forming an independent state-led commission to examine what went wrong on 7 October.
Eisenkot, Bennett, and Lapid have each indicated they believe a parliamentary majority drawn entirely from Jewish parties could be sufficient to seat a new government, setting aside any potential role for Arab party support. With Arab parliamentary factions lending their votes to the arrangement, the resulting government would hold enough seats to pass legislation without relying on opposition support.
Poll numbers and actual votes placed in an election represent two distinct things. How polls are read — and whether their findings are understood on their own terms — carries weight equal to any other part of the process.