Rezaei, serving as secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, conveyed through a formal statement that talks would not restart and the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed to navigation until seven enumerated conditions had been satisfied, adding that communications infrastructure, regional data centres, and artificial intelligence installations stood among the assets that could face action should hostilities resume.

Conveying the position of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution's office to Mehr News Agency, Rezaei described a regional landscape in flux and laid out where the country's posture currently sits — noting that any hostile action toward Iran would carry consequences, that negotiation remains the preferred avenue provided a foundation of mutual understanding can be established, and that options not yet activated remain available to draw upon should confrontations persist. He noted the country was positioned to move into a further phase, with assets deployable in step with the tempo of the conflict.

Rezaei pointed to what he described as broader consequences of the ongoing conflict, stating that the current situation carried wide-ranging strategic implications — among them, a period of sustained turbulence in global energy markets that he put at roughly three years before any stabilisation could be expected. Prolonged fighting, he contended, had tilted the balance of power across the region toward Tehran, a view he supported by pointing to how Persian Gulf states had moved to reassess their ties with Iran.

Rezaei contended that those nations have drawn their own conclusions about the capacity of US forces to safeguard even their own installations, a view shaped by prior assumptions that Washington would extend military protection to allied territories.

Rezaei stated that American infrastructure across the region — including cables, data centres, and artificial intelligence facilities — would fall within range of potential strikes should hostilities resume, and that a broader operational plan for such a scenario had already been drawn up. His remarks pointed toward the possibility that any broadening of hostilities might reach beyond standard military objectives to encompass networks handling digital communications and related infrastructure.

Shifting attention to the Strait of Hormuz, Rezaei described the waterway as one that falls within Iran's sphere of authority, with his country responsible for its day-to-day administration, adding that while smuggling is a phenomenon found across the globe, operations through that passage remain under Tehran's oversight. Rezaei described control of the strait as a matter of national strategic importance, one that extended well past revenue from transit fees — with security forming the core concern, alongside the potential for charges tied to insurance and environmental obligations. His position held that the waterway mattered far more as a piece on a strategic board than as a source of revenue.

Rezaei indicated that the path forward on diplomacy would look different from past frameworks, while leaving open the possibility of continued engagement. Seven fresh demands were relayed to the other side through intermediaries, Rezaei stated, adding that those conditions would first need to be put in place before any reopening of the Strait of Hormuz or a return to talks could take place.

The proposed agreement's architecture, he explained, would carry built-in compliance guarantees — with obligations needing to be acted upon first before anything else could follow. According to Rezaei, a decision by Iran to reopen the strait would follow, with maritime traffic set to resume under arrangements worked out jointly with Oman.

Rezaei conveyed that any arrangement resting solely on the opposing party's political goodwill held no appeal for Iran going forward. He indicated that a route toward reopening the Strait of Hormuz and continuing diplomatic engagement remained available, provided Washington followed through on its obligations, while also stating that any negotiating position built up to bring the other party to talks would not be surrendered in advance of seeing those commitments actually met.