A Conservative election manifesto commitment would cut employer National Insurance contributions on youth wages by half. Under the proposal, businesses taking on workers between the ages of 21 and 24 would face a national insurance rate of 7.5 per cent rather than the current 15 per cent, a reduction that Treasury forecasters put at £2.3 billion in lost receipts.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch described the proposal as financially sound on Wednesday, with party officials adding that a document detailing the funding arrangements would be released. Proponents of the policy argued it would bring tens of thousands of young people into employment, shifting a portion of those currently drawing out-of-work benefits into the tax-paying workforce.
Projected at £3.25 billion on a static basis, the measure's net burden is put by officials at £2.3 billion for 2029-30 once additional tax revenue and reduced Universal Credit outlays are factored into a dynamic assessment.
Appearing across multiple broadcast outlets, Badenoch put forward the view that a recruitment gap among graduates represented a problem requiring attention, while also fielding questions about why the pay rate would hold steady for the majority of workers. She added that the government's approach remained grounded in fiscal responsibility, and contended that young people face a disproportionately heavier burden than other groups. She also stated that reducing costs for everyone would occur given the financial means to do so.
Drawn from the most recent data published by the Office for National Statistics, the count of 16-to-24-year-olds across the UK who were outside any form of education, work, or training stood at roughly 981,000 during the second quarter of this year.
Presenting the national insurance pledge, Shadow Chancellor Andrew Griffith contended that Labour's approach would leave younger people with a weakened economic future. Hiring costs for younger workers have risen across payroll levies, regulatory compliance requirements, and floor-wage adjustments introduced under the current administration's labour agenda.
The Conservatives put forward their platform as the path to lower taxes, less regulation, and better prospects for young people. A Labour party spokesperson described those plans as financially uncosted and unworkable, and further noted that Badenoch's expressed concern for younger generations sat in tension with her party's track record of leaving close to a million of them outside employment or training.
Questions about whether the Conservative Party can be trusted on public finances and opportunities for young people have persisted among its critics. The Shadow Chancellor's reported preference for an additional tax cut without identified funding has also drawn attention to his earlier role as a co-author of the mini-Budget associated with former Prime Minister Liz Truss, which was followed by a period of pronounced economic instability.
A separate Labour plan, outlined the previous week, would commit £2.5 billion toward employment pathways for under-25s, including a nationwide rollout of the Jobs Guarantee, while also blocking school leavers from claiming benefits immediately should the Conservatives return to government. Under a Conservative Party proposal, young people between 16 and 24 who lack six consecutive months of employment would lose access to Universal Credit.
Reform UK's Treasury spokesman Robert Jenrick, who previously served on the Conservative frontbench, outlined a party proposal to remove the national insurance increase introduced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves for all workers, with the cost offset through a levy on migrants.