Aam Aadmi Party's Rajya Sabha member Sanjay Singh has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi requesting that Parliament be convened in a special sitting to address two matters: an alleged deletion of over 13 crore names from electoral rolls, and the manner in which police handled those who gathered in public demonstration against it.
The letter put forward a call for Parliament to convene on an expedited basis, citing three areas of concern: the scale of name deletions from voter rolls under the Special Intensive Revision process, questions surrounding the accuracy and reliability of those lists, and accounts of police detaining and pressuring citizens who were attempting to participate in the electoral process.
Singh argued that carrying out voter-name removals on a wide scale under the Special Intensive Revision programme had put questions around the reliability, openness, and impartiality of the country's electoral framework into circulation. He stated that questions about whether names have been removed from records on a considerable scale call for transparent answers, formal accountability, and thorough debate on the floor of Parliament.
Singh also pointed to gatherings in New Delhi where participants called for Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar to step down, with those present raising questions about the integrity of electoral processes. He added that such questions warranted open scrutiny and that the Election Commission bore a responsibility to preserve its autonomy and uphold the conditions for free and fair elections. Singh further asserted that every citizen who qualifies should be able to cast a ballot free from any threat to that entitlement.
Singh described reports of police behaviour directed at parliamentarians, political figures, party affiliates, journalists, lawyers, students, and protest participants as a matter warranting attention. He added that allegations that women demonstrators had been subjected to unwanted physical contact — particularly by male officers — ranked among the more grave of those reports, and that those responsible ought to face accountability.
Pointing to the constitutional text, Singh drew attention to Article 19(1)(b), which extends to every Indian citizen a protected right to gather peacefully and without weapons. He stated that peaceful assembly and political opposition should not be met with outsized force, arbitrary detention, or blanket curbs on movement.
Singh also highlighted pre-protest measures in Delhi — among them the closure of entry and exit points at 57 Metro stations — along with broader transport disruptions and detentions across the city. His position holds that the measures in question do not adequately balance the scale of restrictions against the rights they affect — namely, the ability of residents in the national capital to gather peacefully and move about freely.
Singh pointed to accounts of lawyers — among them senior practitioners and women advocates — being held near the Supreme Court and subjected to physical abuse. He called for an immediate inquiry into what he described as the treatment of elected officials, journalists, legal professionals, students, and political workers who were acting within their democratic rights.
In his letter, Singh described voting rights, the freedom to dissent, and the ability to gather in peaceful protest as foundational elements underpinning any functioning democracy. He called on the special session to take up a range of concerns: the removal of names from electoral rolls, calls for the Chief Election Commissioner to step down, the behaviour of police toward protesters, cases of detention, protections for women participating in demonstrations, and the impact on public movement caused by Metro station closures and limits placed on peaceful assembly.
Singh concluded by arguing that the matters at hand carry national weight and ought not to be reduced to a question of party politics. He called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi to schedule a special parliamentary sitting at the earliest opportunity, stating that legislators needed a dedicated forum to examine these matters in depth so that outstanding questions could be addressed by the government and accountability properly upheld.