SpaceX chief Elon Musk has directed criticism at Reliance Industries chairman Mukesh Ambani on multiple occasions, voicing objections over the delayed entry of Starlink into the Indian market. On the social media platform X, Musk applied the label "prime minister" to Ambani, a characterisation that carried an implication of outsized influence held by the businessman over India's government.
In a separate line of argument, Musk has maintained that Ambani's conduct blocked Starlink from entering the market — a platform that, by Musk's account, could bring internet access to underserved populations, widen educational opportunities for children, and give small businesses a path to customers outside their immediate areas.
In a Friday post on social media, Musk directed a public question at an unidentified party — asking whether, notwithstanding what he characterised as a preference for keeping internet services under exclusive domestic control, there might be any willingness to allow Starlink to operate as a competing provider in India. The message followed earlier posts in which he had attributed the satellite company's difficulties securing market access to unnamed business interests he alleged were working to protect their own positions.
Responding to allegations about its regulatory environment, the communications ministry maintained that spectrum rules governing satellite services treat all applicants on equal terms, and noted that Starlink — along with two other operators already holding licences — is required to complete mandatory security vetting before spectrum access can be granted. That filing disputed Musk's assertion that Starlink bears a heavier regulatory load than other providers operating in the same space.
Satellite internet services are now on the development agenda for both Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel, two operators whose competition for subscribers has long defined the shape of India's telecommunications landscape. Two separate satellite tie-ups have taken shape among India's leading telecoms operators — Reliance Jio linking up with Luxembourg-headquartered SES, and Airtel anchoring its own arrangement around Eutelsat OneWeb.
Authorisation to begin commercial operations has not yet come through for Starlink, even though the company has cleared certain regulatory hurdles along the way. On his X account, Musk posed a rhetorical question about whether Ambani holds outsized influence over Indian governance, while the tech entrepreneur also faces obstacles in both establishing Tesla's presence in India and advancing Starlink's entry into the market there.
During its opening year of sales, the electric vehicle maker logged 699 units delivered — a figure weighed down by tariff structures that pushed retail prices well above what buyers faced in the United States. Tesla's vehicle pricing in India has held at levels above many competing markets, even after the company introduced measures aimed at bringing costs down.
Talks over how satellite spectrum rights would be divided between Starlink and Reliance Jio have, at various points, drawn sharp disagreement from both sides. Two competing visions for how spectrum should be distributed took shape in the proceedings — SpaceX backing a government-led administrative assignment process, while Jio put its weight behind a market-driven auction model. Under an administrative allocation model, regulatory decisions landed in a way that proved favourable to Starlink's entry into the market.
Telecom minister Jyotiraditya Scindia has put the government on record as opposing monopolistic behaviour across all sectors of the economy.